GW Work

When it comes to environmental regulation, no one is immune to the temptation to put a spin on science to advance a policy goal. While the media will decry the politicization of science – when political decision-makers attempt to distort what scientific studies conclude, problems also arise when scientists and others attempt to exert influence on policy decisions by selectively presenting, or even distorting, scientific findings (scientization of policy). This paper focuses on the scientization of policy, and defines and examines two contributors: the “positive-normative fallacy” (not acknowledging that science alone is insufficient to resolve normative policy questions) and “hidden policy judgments” (not acknowledging the policy judgments inherent in assessments of risk). It examines the process by which the Environmental Protection Agency sets National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) under the Clean Air Act to illustrate some of the perverse incentives involved in developing regulations, and offers possible mechanisms to improve those incentives and resulting policy.

Author

• Dudley, Susan E.

Keyword

• Regulation
• Regulatory Policy
• Public Policy
• Working Paper
• Environmental Policy
• Regulatory Studies

Date created

• 9/9/2015

Type of Work

• Working Paper

Rights statement

• In Copyright

GW Unit

• Regulatory Studies Center

Persistent URL

•  https://scholarspace.library.gwu.edu/work/cc08hf87c

License

• Attribution 3.0 United States

Relationships

Items

Thumbnail	Title	Date Uploaded	Visibility	Actions
	SDudley_Regulatory_Science_NAAQS 2015-09-09.pdf	2018-08-27	Open Access	Press to Select an action Download