GW Work

The complex, yet vague nature, of legislation being generated by lawmakers in Washington, DC requires that public administrators be afforded administrative discretion in carrying out their respective duties. It is no longer possible for policymakers to be fully informed regarding the multitude of variables that exist in the offshore fishing environment, nor is it possible to articulate that spectrum of variables in codified laws and regulations. The academic debate between controlling the exercise of administrative discretion on the one hand and extending the leash of judgment on the other has been around as long as the profession of public administration. In the case of the eleven-inch fish (the fish is one inch shy of being a legal catch), the public administrator on the scene of the infraction has a choice to make. The administrator can choose to overlook the incident, issue a warning, or issue a $100 notice of violation and seize the fish. I know which alternative I chose. The question is, which alternative would you choose?

Author

• Jaccard, Don

Identifier

• Volume 7 - Issue 1

DOI

•  https://doi.org/10.4079/pp.v7i1.4213

Keyword

• Policy Perspectives
• Public Administration

Date created

• 1999

Type of Work

• Article

Rights statement

• In Copyright

GW Unit

• Trachtenberg School of Public Policy & Public Administration

Persistent URL

•  https://scholarspace.library.gwu.edu/work/1j92g801p

License

• All rights reserved

Relationships

In Collection:

• Policy Perspectives

Items

Thumbnail	Title	Date Uploaded	Visibility	Actions
	10_4079_pp_v7i1_4213.pdf	2019-08-05	Open Access	Press to Select an action Download View in Browser