A Seat at the Table Is Not Enough
Open Access DepositedA Study of the Socialization of Black Women During Their Onboarding to Cabinet-Level Positions
Downloadable Content
This qualitative study aimed to explore and understand the socialization experiences of Black women leaders as they transition into executive cabinet positions at higher education institutions in the United States. The focus was on their journey from outsiders to insiders during the onboarding period. The success of these executives depends on their ability to integrate into the organizational culture and establish themselves as insiders. A qualitative narrative inquiry methodology was selected to capture the rich, personal insights and narratives of participants, as this allowed for an in-depth exploration of their lived experiences. The study sample consisted of eight Black women executives in cabinet-level roles across a range of higher education institutions. Data were collected via semi-structured, 60-minute interviews. Data analysis followed Braun and Clarke’s (2006) six-step reflexive thematic analysis process
(a) selection quality as a necessary precursor and (b) integration quality as a sufficient condition for effectiveness. Posthire organizational dynamics—particularly acceptance, socialization, authority calibration, and sponsorship—are determining factors shaping early traction and sustained impact.
becoming familiar with the data, generating initial codes, searching for themes, reviewing themes, defining and naming themes, and producing the report. To ensure trustworthiness, member checks, use of thick, rich description, and efforts to minimize bias were employed. Seven themes emerged from the analysis. Collectively, the themes depict executive socialization as a relational and interpretive process in which leaders recalibrate expectations of cabinet work, negotiate identity under conditions of heightened visibility, and navigate climates shaped by informal hierarchies and representational demands. Limited formal onboarding placed a premium on peer scaffolding and external networks, while stereotype‑aware practices—message discipline, calibrated assertion, and meticulous preparation—functioned as tools for maintaining credibility and influence. Taken together, these findings advance a theoretical model in which executive success is best conceptualized as a two‑stage process
- All rights reserved
Notice to Authors
If you are the author of this work and you have any questions about the information on this page, please use the Contact form to get in touch with us.