Skip to Content

Search

You searched for: Resource Type Other Remove constraint Resource Type: Other

Search Results

  1. Recommendations for Improving the Regulatory Process [Download]

    Title: Recommendations for Improving the Regulatory Process
    Author: Dudley, Susan E.
    Description: Prepared Statement of Susan E. Dudley, The George Washington University Regulatory Studies Center, Response to the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee's Letter Requesting Input on its Regulatory Improvement Effort on May 4, 2015.
    Keywords: Regulation, Testimony, Testimonies, Federal government, Regulatory policy, Public policy, Regulatory studies
    Date Uploaded: 05/05/2018
  2. Ep. 121, 1951-03-28, The Eleanor Roosevelt Program part 1 [Download]

    Title: Ep. 121, 1951-03-28, The Eleanor Roosevelt Program part 1
    Author: Eleanor Roosevelt Papers Project
    Description:
    Keywords: Eleanor Roosevelt Radio and Television, The Eleanor Roosevelt Program
    Date Uploaded: 04/11/2018
  3. A selected bibliography of sources related to archival appraisal theory and collection development [Download]

    Title: A selected bibliography of sources related to archival appraisal theory and collection development
    Author: King, Jennifer
    Description: This bibliography is a selection from a large set of articles used during a project to reconceptualize and rewrite the collection development policy for the Washingtoniana Collection housed within GW’s Special Collections Research Center. This bibliography was created for the article “A No-Budget, In-House, Staff-Led Professional Development Model,” to be published Summer 2018 in the Midwest Archives Conference journal, Archival Issues, Vol 39, Issue 1.
    Keywords: Collection development, Archival appraisal , Archival science, Special collections, Bibliography , Archival appraisal theory
    Date Uploaded: 04/02/2018
  4. Regulatory Reform: What’s New in 2014? [Download]

    Title: Regulatory Reform: What’s New in 2014?
    Author: West, Cassidy B.
    Description: The 113th Congress is considering various bills that would reform the way regulations are developed, analyzed, and reviewed. The GW Regulatory Studies Center has tracked and classified these bills since the beginning of the 113th Congress and will continue tracking and updating the information regularly throughout its duration. By classifying each bill according to its approach to regulatory reform, based on the reform elements below, we hope to shed some light on the types of reforms being considered and their status.
    Keywords: Regulation, Commentaries, Federal government, Regulatory policy, Public policy, Regulatory studies
    Date Uploaded: 03/31/2018
  5. Why Does Benefit-Cost Analysis Seem Blind to Job Impacts? [Download]

    Title: Why Does Benefit-Cost Analysis Seem Blind to Job Impacts?
    Author: Mannix, Brian F.
    Description: My chapter in a new book published this week, Does Regulation Kill Jobs?, explores some of the reasons why the human welfare metric, as it is typically calculated in a BCA, appears to be insensitive to the employment effects that loom so large in the perceptions of the public and its elected representatives. It argues that, to a first approximation, employment effects are already counted in a BCA as a component of compliance costs. Of course, no BCA is ever complete, so it is always possible that some job-related welfare effects are omitted, just as it is likely that some other welfare effects unrelated to employment are also omitted. Any attempt to include additional categories of welfare effects must, however, confront the problem of potentially counting these effects more than once. The chapter concludes that, in most cases, employment effects should be treated as they traditionally have been treated—implicitly part of the calculation of compliance costs—and that some proposed alternatives to the status quo would result in double counting. It would be helpful, however, if economists could do a better job of educating the public about what, exactly, compliance costs represent. If people understood that these are not simply a “cost of doing business” but real welfare changes experienced by the public, then benefit–cost analysis would be a far more informative tool than it is today.
    Keywords: Regulation, Commentaries, Federal government, Regulatory studies, Regulatory policy, Public policy
    Date Uploaded: 03/31/2018
  6. President Nominates Howard Shelanski to be OIRA Administrator [Download]

    Title: President Nominates Howard Shelanski to be OIRA Administrator
    Author: Miller, Sofie E.
    Description: Last week, President Obama nominated Federal Trade Commission (FTC) Chief Economist Howard Shelanski to be the next Administrator of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) within the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). If confirmed by the Senate, Shelanski would fill the position vacated by Cass Sunstein, who returned to Harvard’s law faculty in August 2012. Boris Bershteyn, former OMB General Counsel, had held the position in an acting capacity until his departure from OMB last month. Career Deputy Administrator, Dominic Mancini is currently Acting Administrator.
    Keywords: Regulation, Commentaries, Federal government, Regulatory policy, Regulatory studies, Public policy
    Date Uploaded: 03/31/2018
  7. A Retrospective Review of Retrospective Review [Download]

    Title: A Retrospective Review of Retrospective Review
    Author: Dudley, Susan
    Description: The scope and reach of regulation is growing, and along with it, public concern that there may be too much regulation of private activity. (See annual Gallup poll showing that more respondents are concerned about too much regulation than too little.) In response to this concern, President Obama issued two executive orders directing agencies “to determine whether …existing significant …regulations should be modified, streamlined, expanded, or repealed so as to make the agency’s regulatory program more effective or less burdensome in achieving the regulatory objectives.” The President noted, “during challenging economic times …it is particularly important for agencies to conduct retrospective analyses of existing rules to examine whether they remain justified and whether they should be modified or streamlined in light of changed circumstances, including the rise of new technologies.”
    Keywords: Regulation, Federal government, Commentaries, Regulatory policy, Regulatory studies, Public policy
    Date Uploaded: 03/31/2018
  8. Pace of New Regulations up in President Obama’s First Term [Download]

    Title: Pace of New Regulations up in President Obama’s First Term
    Author: West, Cassidy
    Description: Executive branch agencies are required by Executive Order and statute to measure the impact of regulations, using both ex ante and ex post analyses. Agencies conduct analyses that seek to quantify regulations’ costs and benefits, economic impact, and distributional effects, along with whether the regulation is meeting the policy goals of the President. Measuring the reach and impact of these regulations is difficult though, and analysts look to various proxies in an attempt to measure the effects of regulations over time.
    Keywords: Regulation, Federal government, Commentaries, Regulatory policy, Regulatory studies, Public policy
    Date Uploaded: 03/31/2018
  9. Will EPA’s Retrospective Review Reduce Burdens for the Regulated Public? [Download]

    Title: Will EPA’s Retrospective Review Reduce Burdens for the Regulated Public?
    Author: Miller, Sofie
    Description: In a 2011 report, the Environmental Protection Agency projected that its retrospective review efforts would save $1.5 billion over five years, but are the American people getting what the Agency promised? A recent working paper by the GW Regulatory Studies Center suggests that the unprecedented cost savings and burden reductions that many were hoping for won’t materialize at all—in fact, some of EPA’s retrospective review actions may even come with a hefty price tag.
    Keywords: Regulation, Federal government, Public policy, Regulatory policy, Commentaries, Regulatory studies
    Date Uploaded: 03/31/2018
  10. The Administrative Conference of the United States, 58th Plenary Session [Download]

    Title: The Administrative Conference of the United States, 58th Plenary Session
    Author: West, Cassidy
    Description: On June 13 and 14, 2013, the Administrative Conference of the United States (ACUS) will meet for its 58th Plenary Session. ACUS is an independent federal agency dedicated to improving the administrative process through “consensus-driven applied research, providing nonpartisan expert advice and recommendations for the improvement of federal agency procedures.” The Conference’s 101 members, who include federal officials, private practitioners, and academics with expertise in administrative law, will consider adoption of recommendations on 1) Social Security Disability Adjudication, 2) Benefit-Cost Analysis at Independent Regulatory Agencies, 3) Science in the Administrative Process, and 4) Administrative Record in Informal Agency Proceedings.
    Keywords: Regulation, Commentaries, Federal government, Regulatory policy, Public policy, Regulatory studies
    Date Uploaded: 03/31/2018